Email As part of ongoing efforts to reduce disease and death caused by smoking and secondhand smoke exposure, the CDC Foundation and CDC have launched a new initiative to study the economic impact of smoke-free policies on restaurants and bars in nine states. While the health benefits of smoke-free policies are clear, the perception that they might negatively affect restaurant and bar business can pose a barrier to the broader introduction and acceptance of these policies. This initiative, made possible by a partnership grant from Pfizer to the CDC Foundation, will assess the economic impact of local smoke-free laws on restaurants and bars by examining objective economic indicators.
As before, we offer both the scientific report and media reporting on it, when available, to meet the needs of our various audiences. Tobacco use Historic smoking report marks 50th anniversary Those of us old enough to remember the Virginia Slims commercials from the s will appreciate the irony of employing their slogan regarding changing the culture of smoking: Athletes and even Fred Flintstone endorsed cigarettes in TV commercials.
Smoke hung in the air in restaurants, offices and airplane cabins. More than 42 percent of US adults smoked, and there was a good chance your doctor was among them.
The change of culture around smoking in public is one of the biggest public health success stories, done largely without heavy regulation. See a related article: A Report of the Surgeon General, Cigarette smoke toxins deposited on surfaces: Policy shifts in smoking CVS drugstores to stop selling cigarettes over health issues: This decision came with an expected economic loss to the company.
Effect of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and child health: Chlorinated persistent organic pollutants, obesity, and type 2 diabetes Not only does this article review the extensive evidence linking these conditions, it also explains puzzling findings in the field related to high vs low dose exposures and nonmonotonic dose-response curves, found in not only laboratory but also in epidemiological studies.
It addresses the perplexing role of POPs in adipose tissue— perhaps a safer place to store them than in organs— but also causing harmful inflammatory effects in fatty tissue.
It reviews the role of POPs as potential obesogens, as well as their potential interaction with gut microbiota, mitochondrial dysfunction, and other mechanisms. It outlines how future research may address some of the remaining questions in the field.
Research and controversy around BPA Bisphenol A BPA pharmacokinetics with daily oral bolus or continuous exposure via silastic capsules in pregnant rhesus monkeys: This research addresses the ongoing controversy in BPA research about using silastic capsules versus oral bolus.
This study suggests that oral bolus exposure is not an appropriate human exposure model. Differences in pharmacokinetics of dBPA were evident between pre-pregnancy, early and late pregnancy, likely reflecting changes in maternal, fetal and placental physiology. See opposing views of the review: RAC proposes to strengthen the classification of bisphenol A.
Though there were dozens of news articles and analyses, one example of the reach and possible impact of this story is Data deficit on Elk River chemicals shows need for TSCA reform, legislators say.
Epigenetic changes are most likely responsible, and this provocative study is bringing new challenges to how scientists think about behavior and evolutionary change. Study shows babies can catch it from their mothers and the study: In this last quarter, a few important new studies and reports were published: The chances of a low Apgar score, a summary measure of the health of newborn children, roughly doubled, to more than 5 percent.
Birth outcomes and maternal residential proximity to natural gas development in rural Colorado but also State questions study linking fracking to birth defects.
Ohio earthquakes linked to fracking: As the first course textbook of its kind, it could be used as the basis for the possible inclusion of questions on environmental health as part of the medical board certification process. In many neighborhoods, the main obstacle to good health is poverty For decades, activists and scholars around the country have emphasized that focusing solely on changing individual behaviors is not enough to change the broader patterns of inequities in health.
Researchers who study disparities have found that social and economic factors, such as employment, education, and social networks, also strongly influence whether people have the resources to protect their health.
In racially segregated neighborhoods such as the one discussed in this article, with its crumbling infrastructure and history of institutional neglect, the main obstacle to good health is poverty.
Though this is not news, we chose to include this piece because it highlights not just the problem, but shifts the conversation toward a more ecological model of health and includes possible solutions and some emerging evidence to bolster them as well.
Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: There has been much hyping from climate deniers of the uncertainty around climate science and predictions. This statement provides context for non-scientists. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.As part of ongoing efforts to reduce disease and death caused by smoking and secondhand smoke exposure, the CDC Foundation and CDC have launched a new initiative to study the economic impact of smoke-free policies on restaurants and bars in nine states.
That is, if you care about health, nutrition and chemically free food. In the final analysis, this study is more smoke about food that plays on people’s fears, is subject to misinterpretation by the media and perfect for exploitation by vested interests afraid of losing even more market share to organically grown and locally sourced food.
Latest breaking news, including politics, crime and celebrity.
Find stories, updates and expert opinion. Feb 08, · Issues essays / Smoke Free Restaurants According to an article in Public Health News titled "Number of "˜Smoke-Free' Restaurants Soars", and published March 9, , cigarette smoke contains over 4, chemicals and exposure to environmental smoke or secondhand smoke is responsible for 1, non-smoker deaths in Washington state each year.
These include New York City patrons, restaurants, the New York Health Department, and public health officials. The Department of Health received 2, comments in . 2Department of Public Health, University of Venda, South Africa Research Project no.: SHS of bar-lounges and restaurants with the current smoke-free regulation in Thulamela Municipality.
large number of licensed places of entertainment. However.